Finally got around to buying the old BBC series Hamish Macbeth. Might have to turn on the subtitles for Diane, though.
If you google “arabica vs robusta” you will find lots of links. Most of them consider robusta inferior to arabica, though I am not sure I agree. One article from The Atlantic tells the story: Arabica vs. Robusta: No Contest. A bit of history from the article:
. . . Robusta production greatly increased in the decades since World War II. Europe was devastated by the war. Food and money were scarce. The coffee markets responded in very different ways. In Germany, people who could afford it, wanted to buy beans so they could see whether fillers like chicory had been added. No “ersatz” coffee for them. In Italy and France, cheaper coffees and fillers found their way into the national taste. France encouraged Robusta production in its former colonies in west Africa and imposed a tax on Arabica coffees in support of that effort. Even now, blends that are 100 percent Arabica are always labeled to attract more discriminating buyers and to justify the increased price.
In the U.S., following the Brazilian frost of 1954, Maxwell House began blending Robusta to lower their costs. Others soon followed. All mainstream consumers in most every country have been very sensitive to coffee prices, which prompts roasters to maintain lower cost contents
A bit better is from Lavazza: Arabica and Robusta Coffee: Two species, infinite blends
They describe robusta as:
Coffea Canephora (Robusta) is widespread in Africa, Asia, and Indonesia, and accounts today for approximately one third of the world’s production. It grows at altitudes between sea level and 600 meters, where it can bear very hot and humid climates, with peak temperatures of over 30°C.
After roasting, the yield is a full-bodied coffee with a chocolatey flavor and a persistent aftertaste.
Sounds good to me.
Germany, August 11, 2017
A Google search of “Las Vegas shooter motive” shows up the following headlines from major news sources (you can do your own Google for the links):
- Las Vegas gunman carefully planned attack; motive is mystery
- Las Vegas shooting: Police release preliminary report, no motive …
- Las Vegas shooting suspect’s motive remains a mystery – USA Today
- Las Vegas mass shooting: No motive uncovered | abc7.com
- Still no motive in Las Vegas mass shooting – NY Daily News
- No motive uncovered for Las Vegas mass shooting, sheriff says | WGN …
Now if you change the search slightly and Google “Las Vegas shooter losing money” you get:
- Las Vegas shooter had been losing money for two years and ‘was …
- Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock had lost money, been – CBS News
- Las Vegas shooting: Gunman Stephen Paddock lost significant money …
- Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock lost money in 2 years preceding …
- Las Vegas Sheriff Says Gunman of Mass Shooting Had Been Losing …
So is losing ‘significant money’ at a casino for two years not a motive for shooting the place up? Especially in the absence of any other reasons? I guess that would be bad for business to publish that.
One bag is dried bananas (as indicated), the other is a dog snack. Best to know the difference! Also a dragon fruit and some soursop fruit juice from Central Market.